Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Adapted from Wikipedia · Adventurer experience
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the highest court in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System. It started in 1684 as the Provincial Court and became officially known as the "Supreme Court" in 1722 when it was reorganized to operate separately from the colonial governor. It is the oldest appellate court in the United States, although some argue this title belongs to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has a discretionary docket, which means it can choose which cases to hear, except for certain important appeals like those related to the Commonwealth Court. This power gives the court a big role in shaping and explaining the laws of Pennsylvania.
History
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania began in 1684 as the Provincial Court. It was named the Supreme Court in 1722 when it became separate from the colonial governor. It is the oldest appellate court in the United States.
From 1780 to 1808, Pennsylvania had a High Court of Errors and Appeals. After this court ended, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania became the final court of appeal. It is more than 100 years older than the United States Supreme Court.
Composition and rules
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania meets in three cities: Harrisburg, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh.
The Court has seven justices, each elected to serve for ten years. The justice with the most years of service becomes the chief justice. Justices must leave the Supreme Court when they turn 75.
Before 2002, judges in Pennsylvania could not talk about certain legal or political issues. After a decision in another state changed this rule, Pennsylvania updated its rules too. Now, judges can share their political views as long as they do not promise how they will decide future cases.
When a judge’s ten-year term ends, people in Pennsylvania vote yes or no to keep them. If they are kept, they serve another ten years. If not, the governor picks a temporary replacement until a special election.
Justices
Main article: List of justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has seven members. These members are called justices. Voters choose them to serve for ten years.
| Name | Born | Start | Term ends | Mandatory retirement | Party | Appointer | Law school |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debra Todd, Chief Justice | (1957-10-15) October 15, 1957 | January 7, 2008 | 2027 | 2032 | Democratic | —N/a | Pittsburgh |
| Christine Donohue | (1952-12-24) December 24, 1952 | January 4, 2016 | 2035 | 2027 | Democratic | —N/a | Duquesne |
| Kevin Dougherty | (1962-05-19) May 19, 1962 | January 4, 2016 | 2035 | 2037 | Democratic | —N/a | Antioch |
| David Wecht | (1962-05-20) May 20, 1962 | January 4, 2016 | 2035 | 2037 | Independent | —N/a | Yale |
| Sallie Updyke Mundy | (1962-06-29) June 29, 1962 | July 21, 2016 | 2027 | 2037 | Republican | Tom Wolf (D) | Pittsburgh |
| Kevin Brobson | (1970-11-26) November 26, 1970 | January 3, 2022 | 2031 | 2045 | Republican | —N/a | Widener (PA) |
| Daniel McCaffery | (1964-07-20) July 20, 1964 | January 1, 2024 | 2033 | 2039 | Democratic | —N/a | Temple |
Notable cases
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has decided many important cases. In Eakin v. Raub (1825), the Court decided it can review state laws if they go against the state Constitution. In Commonwealth v. Mimms (1975), the Court said Harry Mimms’ case needed a new trial because his rights were violated.
In League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth (2018), the Court ruled that the state’s congressional map was unfair and needed to be redrawn. In Commonwealth v. Davis (2019), the Court decided that people cannot be forced to give their digital account passwords to law enforcement.
In Commonwealth v. Barr II (2021), the Court ruled that police cannot search someone without a warrant just because they smell cannabis. In Always Busy Consulting, LLC v. Babford & Co. (2021), the Court said a lower court made a mistake by focusing too much on technical details instead of the facts.
In Commonwealth v. Berry (2024), the Court decided that arrests and charges alone, without an actual conviction, are not enough proof in court. In Sitler v. Jones (2025), the Court said an old assumption about parentage was outdated.
Images
Related articles
This article is a child-friendly adaptation of the Wikipedia article on Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Images from Wikimedia Commons. Tap any image to view credits and license.
Safekipedia